[gclist] gc concerns
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:44:31 +1100
On 13-Dec-2000, Manoj Plakal <email@example.com> wrote:
> Boehm, Hans wrote (Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:13:48AM -0800) :
> > 1) Most modern computers are memory-poor in comparison to the processor
> > speed. Hence there is strong motivation to keep heap sizes down, and thus
> > most applications run with heap sizes that are small enough that
> > stop-the-world collections finish in a reasonable amount of time, and GC
> > pause times are often not much of an issue.
> This may be true for a desktop or workstation but I'm
> not sure this applies to servers. They seem to be
> loaded with gigabytes of RAM these days.
I think Hans meant memory *speed* is poor in comparison to processor
speed. Even though computers may have gigabytes of RAM, there's still
a strong incentive to keep heap sizes down, since you'll get better
locality and hence better cache performance.
So, suppose you have a 4-CPU system, with each one being say a 1GHz
Pentium III, and you want GC pause times of no more than 1/3 of a second.
How big can your heap be?
Fergus Henderson <firstname.lastname@example.org> | "I have always known that the pursuit
| of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.