[gclist] Re: gclist-digest V3 #84
John R Levine
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:36:24 -0400 (EDT)
> >The unglamorous way of saying this is: "You have just re-invented the
> Yes and no. OS Interprocess communication is typically quite expensive.
> "Processes" enforced by the language need not be nearly so heavyweight.
> On the other hand, the vast differences in overhead mean that extension
> to distributed processing is hardly "trivial".
Well, OK, you've just reinvented OS/360 MVT, which put all the processes in
one address space. It's not a terrible idea if they need to communicate and
you can predict the amount of memory they'll need. On the other hand, the
fact that MVT is long dead, replaced by MVS which allocates an address space
per process may tell us something.
John Levine, email@example.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://iecc.com/johnl, Sewer Commissioner
Finger for PGP key, f'print = 3A 5B D0 3F D9 A0 6A A4 2D AC 1E 9E A6 36 A3 47