[gclist] why malloc/free instead of GC?
Enrico Weigelt
weigelt@metux.de
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:20:56 +0100
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:11:07PM +0100, Juergen Christoffel wrote:
> Yes, generational GC for example.
>
> Back in the eighties and early nineties, when Symbolics introduced
> generational GC on their Lisp Machines, large programs did run faster with
> GC turned on than without GC when the "Ephemeral GC" (that was their name
> for Generational GC, IIRC) was turned on because this reduced working sets.
How does this one work ?
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux ITS
Webhosting ab 5 EUR/Monat. UUCP, rawIP und vieles mehr.
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact@metux.de
cellphone: +49 174 7066481 smsgate: sms.weigelt@metux.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt. http://www.metux.de/uucp/