[gclist] why malloc/free instead of GC?

Enrico Weigelt weigelt@metux.de
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:20:56 +0100


On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:11:07PM +0100, Juergen Christoffel wrote:

> Yes, generational GC for example. 
> 
> Back in the eighties and early nineties, when Symbolics introduced
> generational GC on their Lisp Machines, large programs did run faster with
> GC turned on than without GC when the "Ephemeral GC" (that was their name
> for Generational GC, IIRC) was turned on because this reduced working sets.
How does this one work ? 

cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux ITS 
 Webhosting ab 5 EUR/Monat.          UUCP, rawIP und vieles mehr.

 phone:     +49 36207 519931         www:       http://www.metux.de/     
 fax:       +49 36207 519932         email:     contact@metux.de
 cellphone: +49 174 7066481	     smsgate:   sms.weigelt@metux.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt.      http://www.metux.de/uucp/