another topic (which language to use)
Fri, 25 Apr 1997 23:43:01 +0200 (MESZ)
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Marco Antoniotti wrote:
> Having said so, I really want to stress that whatever the end result,
> any process that will lead there will be successful as long as it does
> not try to reinvent anything new.
I think that an inefficient os called lispos would be a failure - very
bad pr for lisp. The result shouldn't perform worse than cmucl on linux