Mon, 5 May 1997 13:56:57 -0500
| From: firstname.lastname@example.org
| Well said. It seems that a system built on Linux/BSD and gradually
| the pieces is more likely to actually be built. Once it is, it would be
| a great platform on which to build the system that I think we all really
| It'll also be a good place to make mistakes which can be learned from
| the real OS is written. If we can focus on this model, then we can stop
| arguing about whether or not pathnames should be supported and instead
| generalize an interface which can support both pathnames and something
| So...while the linux/BSD argument rages on, could I get a quick pointer
| CMU-CL from someone since we appear to have agreed on that?
Ah, well, that I can do:
CMU-CL is at <http://www.cons.org/cmucl/cmucl-cvs.html>.
I second (third?) your comments as well.