Testing the waters.
Thu, 8 May 1997 20:01:20 -0700
> It doesn't work for POS code though. I've tried it, and it doesn't
> work. If you do try you'll defeat the purpose of POS.
> This argument is getting pretty damn tiresome since you haven't even
> defined what you're idea of a persistent object system is. Saying
> existing code is "The LispOS Way" because it doesn't use a POS is
> utterly ludicrous, and you seem utterly resistant to arguments against
> that, so please, at least define what terms you're talking in so we
> can start making sense instead of just shouting past each other.