Immutable things.
Henry G. Baker
hbaker@netcom.com
Tue, 13 May 1997 13:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
> By making the kernel small, you make
> everything else huge. What benefit is there to that?
>
> --David Gadbois
I don't see how this follows. There isn't a kernel
vs. everything-else philosophy here. You start with a small,
efficient, easily portable core, and start layering stuff on top of
it. It grows organically, and upon occasion, may 'reflect' upon its
own lower-level implementation.
Rodney Brooks's 'subsumption'/'layered' architecture for his mobile
robots is not a bad metaphor here. (He has a web page at MIT, and
various of his papers are available via the AI Lab memo server, but I
don't have the url's off the top of my head.) BTW, Brooks is one of
the architects of Lucid's excellent Lisp compiler.
--
Henry Baker
www/ftp directory URL:
ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/hb/hbaker/home.html