Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:51:40 -0800 (PST)
>From email@example.com Thu Mar 19 15:25:36 1998
>Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 18:08:30 -0500 (EST)
>Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:09:28 +0100
>From: "Gavin E. Gleason" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>To: LispOS Mailling List <email@example.com>
>Subject: Benevolent Dictatorship
>Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
>X-Mailing-List: <firstname.lastname@example.org> archive/latest/1880
>. From what I've seen so
>far there is not a massive divergence in ideas about "what" should be in
>the lisp OS. Most of the divergence is in the "how".
Have any of you read the last 1800 messages on this list? If that
doesn't convince you that there is indeed a "massive divergence" of
ideas then I guess I don't know what you mean by that term!
> 1. scheme or lisp. Yikes! Thats a dangerous one :).
Yikes is right. We've been over this one. Again and again and again ...
> 2. Bootstraping. This is a particularly difficult question,
>as the FLUX OS toolkit is unavailable. I think that we should open the
>table for motions on options in this catagory
That kind of leaves a stripped down Linux or BSD. And we've been
over this one many a times before too.
> Gavin E. Gleason