It was our last best hope for peace...
P T Withington
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 16:41:44 -0400
On 10/7/98 13:09, Kragen wrote:
Sun's experience seems to mirror Symbolics': they've built a CPU as big
as a Pentium with less than 1/2 the horsepower. I'm surprised that they
couldn't do better.
>Looks like pointer security etc. in hardware is dead for a while,
>I suspect that pointer security in general will make a comeback,
>though. As applications get bigger, programmers get more expensive,
>software gets cheaper, and CPUs get faster, it will become more and
>more appealing. (Lots of the folks here have found it appealing for
>decades, of course -- who wants to go implement ad hoc memory
>management for every program they write? Or fight with SIGSEGV?)
I keep hoping. But it seems it isn't going to happen until customers
demand it or the government legislates it. Unfortunately few people can
make the connection that "General Protection Fault" means "your software
vendor should be using a garbage collector". Perhaps more fortunately,
too few people have died due to wild references for the government to
feel compelled to legislate better security.