(forwarded) RE: Moose revision 0!
Dennis Marer
dmarer@td2cad.intel.com
Fri, 12 Feb 93 13:21:25 PDT
----- Begin Included Message -----
From: <newlin@ecn.purdue.edu>
Message-ID: <9302121631.AA22481@lucky.ecn.purdue.edu>
Subject: Re: Moose Revision 0!
To: <haydedr@WKUVX1.BITNET>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 93 11:31:50 EST
>Also, our OS will not run on anything less than a 386SX, so is there
>perhaps a similar cutoff in the Motorola chips. I mean, is there such
>a difference between, say, the 68020 and the 68030, that we should not
>develop for anything less than the 68030?
The 68030 is only different from the '020 in that it has an
MMU on board, where the '020 needs external support.
>And, about Mac support, isn't the user interface part of a Mac OS in
>ROM?
Yup. And parts of the ROM are not re-entrant. (ICK!)
-John Newlin
newlin@ecn.purdue.edu
PS- I don't have an alias set up for the list yet, could you forward this?
----- End Included Message -----