Additional Pidginal

[Brian Rice]

Yeah, that could be done: the pushBoolean: interpreter method, that is. 
The latter would require a pidgin macro (defined next to 
`pidginPrimitive) or some enhancement to the C generator.

On Nov 17, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Lyndon Tremblay wrote:

> Also,
>
>   ('somePrimitive' directly!Bool) ifTrue: [interpreter pushTrue]
>           ifFalse: [interpreter pushFalse]
>
> Could perhaps warrant an addition to interpreter as 'pushBool[ean]:' Or
> perhaps there is a further simplification. Combination of 'directly' 
> and
> 'pushXyz' calls? IE. repetition of pidgin definitions with a very 
> obvious
> simplifiable pattern

--
Brian T. Rice
LOGOS Research and Development
http://tunes.org/~water/