Oddballs and clonability
nicolas.pelletier3 at free.fr
nicolas.pelletier3 at free.fr
Thu Oct 7 22:52:37 PDT 2004
Pupeno <pupeno at pupeno.com> writes:
> It is not clear enough that is a warning of known issue, something that should
> be fixed, a bug. At least, I didn't understand it.
> I'd say something like: "Note: Currently, because of a known problem in Slate
> inheritance, the clone message is available for any Slate object, including
> Oddballs, and always produce a new, bitwise identical copy of its receiver.
> You should therefore be extra careful when the result of a clone is used
> inside a test, since all of the following expressions return False."
Ok, this wording is now on-line, thanks.
Also, I noticed I inadvertently swapped the traits and parent0 labels
in the drawing about deriving objects :-( If z derives from x, then z
traits traits == x traits traits == Traits traits. This mistake seems
to have caused some confusion (according to the IRC logs). I
apologize. A fixed version is on-line.
> Thank you... thank you for the tutorial, it is much improved :D
Well, it is always nice to get thanks, but the tutorial is a very
little piece of work compared to all the thoughts and efforts Lee and
Brian put (and continue to put) into Slate. They deserve to be thanked
much more than I do.
--
Nicolas
More information about the Slate
mailing list