[Poll] Optional keywords when looking at methods

[Brian Rice]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Since there were no negative comments, I went ahead and implemented  
it, and bootstrapped in this change and others like at:(put:) and  
restoringPositionDo: for File. So alpha is updated.

On Dec 8, 2005, at 3:29 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:

> Brian Rice wrote:
>> My question is: does this look right? Also, are there other things we
>> should show in method printouts, such as the number of inputs for an
>> anonymous block (you can infer them for named methods)?
>
> Yes, it looks good; and yes, arity info would also be handy.
>
>> Showing full source is cumbersome, and belongs in a proper UI that  
>> isn't
>> ready yet.
>
> That's true.

- --
- -Brian
http://tunes.org/~water/brice.vcf

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFDmGpZPVkAvLW1zf4RAmMoAJ90FW4RH9dC2rO7pwhsTCRdGYJ29QCguaPk
Y0mnE8cLuWA4Sb+ItV+wu1A=
=O/p+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----