Alpha VM on Solaris UltraSPARC?
Nick Forde
nickf at system-7.freeserve.co.uk
Sat Mar 12 12:13:28 PST 2005
Unfortunately using -mno-faster-structs didn't work but switching to
-O0 did.
For reference I tried building slate using GCC v3.2.3 on a number of
other Unix
platforms and didn't encounter any other compatibility problems.
The vm and mobius/vm/platform/unix code appears to be very portable -
nice job!
These worked OK using -O2:
Linux 2.4.9-enterprise #1 SMP, i686
OSX Darwin 7.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.8.0, powerpc
AIX 3 4 0000C35B4C00 - IBM,7043-260
and the following core dumped with -O2 but worked with -O0:
SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-29 sun4u sparc SUNW, Sun-Fire-880
HP-UX B.11.00 U 9000/785 2011991039, J6000 Workstation
Nick.
On 13 Mar 2005, at 00:02, Lee Salzman wrote:
> In our case it is definitely a problem with GCC. The field of the
> structure in
> question may be aligned to an 8 byte boundary, but the structure
> itself is
> only aligned to a 4 byte boundary in the Slate heap. This is, overall,
> a policy
> decision on GCC's part to ignore this possibility to eek out a few
> more cycles
> here and there.
>
> It seems the options -mno-faster-structs on SPARC may entirely solve
> this
> problem, and it may be that at higher optimization levels GCC assumes
> -mfaster-structs. The man page says this controls the assumption of 8
> byte
> alignment of structures. So ya'll try using -mno-faster-structs and
> see what
> happens.
>
> Lee
More information about the Slate
mailing list