Some questions on Slate syntax
shaping at earthlink.net
Sat Mar 26 22:37:11 PST 2005
> 1. Why 0-based arrays?
> 0-based arrays don't seem to be as intuitive and easy to use as
> 1-based. If you want to create an array with x elements, the last
> element's index is x-1, rather than just plain old x. Not only is
> there an extra calculation involved, but if you're careless or just
> happen to typed a typo, you'll get one of those bugs that you'll want
> to slap yourself in the face with.
I have the same question/complaint, despite the slight improvement in
machine-efficiency it creates. The convention produces much programmer
inefficiency--extra thinking/translating/checking. Counting starts at 1.
More information about the Slate