Repository / section for code not to be taken seriously?
Brian Rice
water at tunes.org
Thu Nov 3 11:09:57 PST 2005
On that note, are there any opinions on a src/contrib/ or a contrib
repository? The former sounds better since people will get everything
at once, darcs move can work for integration and of course darcs send
instructions are re-used directly.
I'd like to get more involvement and clarity in our project... so
comments are welcome.
On Nov 3, 2005, at 7:22 AM, Brian Rice wrote:
> The point of versioning is just to have a record of changes. You
> wouldn't believe some of the funky code that original versions of
> files in Slate were. :) In other words, the darcs repository isn't
> some holy shrine.
>
> On Nov 3, 2005, at 6:30 AM, Márton Sasvári (IJ/ETH) wrote:
>
>> Brian,
>>
>> Sorry, I did not have time since then to improve on it but I'll
>> get to it in the next month. I don't think it's worth to put it
>> under versioning before that.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marton
--
-Brian
More information about the Slate
mailing list