Concurrency Proposal

[Brian Rice]

Yes, the purpose is to focus on exactly this level right now (while  
keeping other ideas in mind, but not dwelling on them or detailing  
them).

On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Levi Pearson wrote:

> So anyway, please comment first on what is actually in the proposed
> system instead of what is outside of its scope, because the
> higher-level things are never going to happen without the ability to
> do low-level task switching and i/o that doesn't block the whole
> system.

--
-Brian
http://tunes.org/~water/brice.vcf

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : /archives/slate/attachments/20060309/d2d85521/PGP.pgp