KISS, KISS, KISS, KISS, KISS..
Johan Van Schalkwyk
jvs@iconz.co.nz
Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:19:36 +1300 (NZDT)
KISS
KISS
KISS
KISS
KISS
KISS
KISS
Yes, it's me, back again. (JVS)
No, it's not that I'm _particularly_ glad to see you!
It's just that I'm distressed about all this speculation about word sizes.
Surely we should be asking "What is the correct size for a word in our
(ideal?) OS, not "How many different conventions should we support?" or
"Why not have a variety of word sizes from say 1 bit to 157 bits?"
???
In my opinion, the word size depends on the "granularity" of the (numbers
/ ideas / items / concepts) you are working with. For most applications,
32 bits is _MORE_ than enough. For playing around with weather
forecasting.. you almost certainly need 64 bit floats. I doubt that even
in future machines, for most common-or-garden tasks, you will _NEED_ more
than 32 bits. Someone with more knowledge, please tell me about 64(+) bits
and nonlinear complex/chaotic systems!
So,
let's cut the crap, and say:
Two word sizes:
1. 32 bits !
((2. For real floats, 64 bits))
Comments? Questions? Raspberries?
Later on, I'll give a few ideas about what to _do_ with the 32 bits!!!
JVS.
Keep it straight and simple!