LLL strategy

[Raul Deluth Miller]

Dr. J. Van Sckalkwyk:
: Should we be looking at C for our implementation, or design our own
: "Symbolic assembly language" based on our pooled knowledge /
: evaluation of various microprocessors..

Well...

one of our goals is a "new and better high level language".

another of our goals is "marketabilty"

which indicates, to me, both.

By the way, C is ammenable to a variety of mappings:
  function=cell, data=cell (lots of communication)
  module=cell (watch those externs)
  linked program=cell
  os=cell

This sort of choice would be best expressed as "compiler options".

-- 
Raul D. Miller          N=:((*/pq)&|)@                 NB. public e, y, n=:*/pq
<rockwell@nova.umd.edu> P=:*N/@:#               NB. */-.,e e.&factors t=:*/<:pq
                        1=t|e*d    NB. (,-:<:)pq is four large primes, e medium
x-:d P,:y=:e P,:x                  NB. (d P,:y)-:D P*:N^:(i.#D)y [. D=:|.@#.d