What about this?

[David E. Manifold]

On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, Fare Rideau wrote:

> The question of FAT binaries has been rebated to death on the list before.
> My personal conclusion was that SLIM binaries (as in Juice) were much better,
> with FAT parts just where it's needed, that is, performance-intensive
> parts (hey! I'm talking about code, not women).
But you were thinking about women, weren't you!  :-P

It has been debated.  Possibly re-debated.  Rebated means to give
someone's money back. 

I believe my previous message states my ideas clearly about fat vs. slim
binaries.

David E. Manifold <dem@pacificrim.net> http://www.pacificrim.net/~dem/