Philosophical musings: interpreting models
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 20:43:29 -0700
> From: Tom Novelli [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Subject: Re: Philosophical musings: interpreting models
> On 7 Sep 1999, Laurent Martelli wrote:
> > So I'd rather have one language (understand one semantic), and have
> > the opportunity to change the syntax to make it more
> > user-friendly for
> > different domains. Take LISP. Most people think it has a very
> > inconvenient syntax because of all the parenthesis. However, it has
> > one of the cleanest semantic. What prevents us from wrting a special
> > editor that would allow us to write (2+5)*3 instead of (* 3
> > (+ 2 5)) ?
> Better yet, add an infix parser to a LISP or FORTH interpreter. It's
> clean and simple. For convenience I'd add a little special syntax:
There are complete reader macros for both Lisp and Scheme to do this. Not
many people use them, though. Infix is point-blank TERRIBLE for returning
results. There's a nice little parser for Forth which converts some Fortran
into Forth. Used like this:
1 x !
." Hi, I'm calculating: " i" 3*4+x" . CR ;
INTRAN is its name.
> Tom Novelli