[unios] Re: UniOS Definition & Direction

[Anders Petersson]

From: Anders Petersson <anders.petersson@mbox320.swipnet.se>

>From: Pieter Dumon <Pieter.Dumon@rug.ac.be>
>> From: Anders Petersson <anders.petersson@mbox320.swipnet.se>
>> >From: Pat Wendorf <beholder@ican.net>

>> >> It will have to be broken down into specific catagories of
>> >> standardization. It would be best to start at the programing
>> >> level [APIs] and work our way down.
>> >
>> >I was thinking to start on the object format first, then move on to the
>> hardware abstract
>> >objects/drivers.  If we vote on the necessity of a kernel, then we will
>> work out the
>> >kernel API, otherwise we determine which functions go into the system
>> abstract.
>> 
>> NO VOTE! If we reason about it, we will discover if it's needed or not.
>> These are technical issues, not beliefs.
>
>But these technical issuse have already been sorted out at universities
>all over the world, research labs etc... 
>::Ten years ago.

So? If these (technical) issues all have been sorted out, there should be
no _need_ to vote.

If you necessarily want me to vote, I vote for consensus decisions. :o)

binEng


------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UniOS Group
http://members.xoom.com/unios