different alternatives for lispOS

[Hannes Haug]

On 25 Apr 1997, Marcus Daniels wrote:

> >>>>> "RC" == Richard Coleman <coleman@math.gatech.edu> writes:
> 
> RC> 1) Layer a scheme distribution directly on top of the Flux OS
> RC> toolkit
> 
> I suspect this is too hard, and won't result in utility that will keep
> people engaged in improving the system.  [...]
>
> RC> 2) Layer a scheme distribution on top of a minimal Linux
> RC> distribution.  [...]
> 
> [...]  Still, I think #2 is the best approach, though, because it
> could go in a number of different directions without too much pain.

I think
sed s#SML/NJ#CMUCL#g \
http://www.cs.utah.edu/projects/flux/oskit/html/testimonials.html
would be a good starting point.

 -hh