different alternatives for lispOS
Fri, 25 Apr 1997 23:06:31 +0200 (MESZ)
On 25 Apr 1997, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> >>>>> "RC" == Richard Coleman <email@example.com> writes:
> RC> 1) Layer a scheme distribution directly on top of the Flux OS
> RC> toolkit
> I suspect this is too hard, and won't result in utility that will keep
> people engaged in improving the system. [...]
> RC> 2) Layer a scheme distribution on top of a minimal Linux
> RC> distribution. [...]
> [...] Still, I think #2 is the best approach, though, because it
> could go in a number of different directions without too much pain.
sed s#SML/NJ#CMUCL#g \
would be a good starting point.