Mon, 28 Apr 1997 14:01:31 -0700
>Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 05:27 -0400
>Subject: Slow down!!
>To: mikemac, firstname.lastname@example.org
> Next, the LispM camp. What advantage will an integrated Lisp and OS
> bring to the commercial world?
>To answer that question, I have to describe first the area in which I
>see a Lispm-like system as indispensable.
>So, to answer the question (why would the commercial world choose this?),
>because it could get more functionality for less money, or in some cases,
>functionality at all (since the projects when tackled in less flexible
>environments would be virtually undoable, no matter how much was spent).
Is this a fair summary of the LispM position: there are still large
problems that require an integrated solution and a LispM provides an
environment that can handle these problems easier than other
I'd agree to that. I guess one of the major drawbacks to the
Symbolics line of LispMs was delivery of the final solution was
expensive. I'm assuming you're arguing that commodity PCs with a
"LispOS" would make a cost effective delivery platform. I think I'd
agree to that too. Maybe the LispM's time has come after all.
> How will your tightly integrated LispM
> environment interoperate with the existing disjointed world?
>Via the network.
In a client/server app, I can see how that would work. In a more
general environment, it's a bit cloudier. Would you support X for
displaying remote apps? Or JAVA? Or HTML? How about all of those