Unicode (Was: mikemac's proposal)
Fri, 9 May 1997 18:01:17 +0200 (MET DST)
On Fri, 9 May 1997, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> That's great. I actually was suggesting to use Unicode _if_ we were
> going to write something from scratch, and to use whatever there was
> available if using cmucl. Of course, Unicode in cmucl would be the best.
With Unicode support in the kernel and libc6 the time should be right to
> If you don't already know it, the following paper may be useful:
I'll look at them, thanks!
> How do you plan to make readtables in Unicode work? or are you
> considering unicode only for characters and strings, and not for
> source code?
As the lisp compiler is written in lisp I can't see how it should lack
support. The right approach is to redefine what we mean with character,
right? (I should read up in the HyperSpec on this) The only problem I
still have is if all characters should be Unicode or if we should support
a "compressed" character that's ascii only. (and 7 bits only to avoid
As a multi-lingual European I'm often amazed how much software _still_
thinks that everybody is an American. The amount of work I have to do to
get X and xemacs to accept dead-keys is frustrating. And even then it
doesn't work 100%. (like ispell) :-(
It's logic Jim, but not as we know it.
Look in keyservers for PGP key.
GS/CS/L/C d->? s+:++>+@ a-- C++(+++)>$ ULOS++>++++$ P+>++++ L+++>++++
E>++ W+(--) U++>+++ o>+ K? w--- O>+@ M-? V? PS++ PE(--) Y+ PGP+>++
t++>+++ 5++ X++>+++ R tv b+++>++++ DI++ D++@ G+>++ e++>++++ h!>+ r-@ y>+++**@