Testing the waters.
Alaric B. Williams
Sat, 10 May 1997 10:49:38 +0000
> Suppose my company were interested in developing LispOS in
> this manner:
> Native i386 code,
> no underlying unix (lisp down to the metal),
FluxOS toolkit would be a good idea IMHO, since there's a lot
of tedious coding to be done to reach that level, and it's not
an area that Lisp improves on greatly.
> start with Scheme as basis language,
Fair enough, although Scheme does suffer from minimality, IMHO.
Have you seen the EuLisp draft spec? Now /that/ looks more like
it! I haven't the URL any more, sadly, but It's Out There.
> design with support for persistent object system,
> implementation tools running on '95/NT,
> free software.
> How many people would be interested in actually investing
> time and energy on this? If there is a critical mass, I'll
> start the project.
Hmmm, I'd be able to help with concepts and troubleshooting, and I
may have some time to code. I have NT4.0, BTW.
Alaric B. Williams (email@example.com)
---<## OpenDOS FAQ ##>---
Plain HTML: http://www.delorie.com/opendos/faq/
Fancy HTML: http://www.deltasoft.com/faq0000.html