Thu, 15 May 1997 10:54:14 +0200
Ingemar Hulthage writes:
>> Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 19:44 EDT
>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Henry G. Baker)
>> > I think I can count on my hands how many people think
>> > complex numbers should be retained in a new CL.
>I have to disagree strongly. Complex numbers are very important in
>mathematics, physics and engineering.
Yes , I agree. Complex numbers are very important, and it is also very
important that you have an easy way of using them. I would say we need
the whole numeric tower, and even more than is currently in
CL. Infinite precision reals, exact computable reals and p-adic
numbers are also very important.
But, with Lisp there is no need to have it in the language proper! It
could equally well be in a standard library. All that is important is
that the integration and implementation is well done.
Andreas Eder NetWorker (ReliantUnix)
SNI AG Phone: +49-89-636-42549
OEC HES XP 2 Fax: +49-89-636-40601
D-81739 Munich, Germany
for public access: http://www.sni.de/public/mr/nsr/nsr_en.htm
for SNI personnel only: http://athen.mch.sni.de/networker/welcome.htm
Is "Windows for Dummies" another case of "this sentence no verb?"