Alaric B. Williams
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:27:20 +0000
[fixed16 et al]
> This is not really such a bad idea, because there aren't nearly the
> wide variety of hardware datatypes that there used to be. I haven't
> seen 18-bit or 36-bit integers in a long time.
Well, I'd worry about future compatability. Like trinary computers,
for example - they're more efficient on bus widths!
IMHO, types like:
(ranged-integer 0 100) ;fixnum
(module-integer 256) ;fixnum w/o range checks, v. fast for
solve most of the problems, since we don't have mad ADA unions et al.
I'll read Henry's paper, anyway, and see if I need to revise this...
Alaric B. Williams (firstname.lastname@example.org)
---<## OpenDOS FAQ ##>---
Plain HTML: http://www.delorie.com/opendos/faq/
Fancy HTML: http://www.deltasoft.com/faq0000.html