scheme vs common lisp
Fri, 20 Mar 1998 20:07:26 -0800
>Subject: Re: scheme vs common lisp
>Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 19:57:08 -0600
>From: Lyn A Headley <email@example.com>
>>>>>> "Mike" == Mike McDonald <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Mike> I don't know where people get this idea that CMUCL is
> Mike> "barely" supported.
>I got the idea from the announcement for CMUCL 17f, at
>Although the group lives on (and is working on Dylan/Gwydion), the CMU Common
>Lisp project is no longer funded, so only minimal CL support is being done at
>I think it's great that you love CMUCL so much. I'm sure it's a fine
>system and I wish you good luck with your HPUX port. However, it is
>a less appropriate choice for crafting a lisp OS than RScheme.
That's why we still have a "massive divergence" of options.