scheme vs common lisp
Fri, 20 Mar 1998 17:03:53 -0800 (PST)
>From: Mike McDonald <email@example.com>
>Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 15:47:19 -0800 (PST)
>To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
>Subject: Re: scheme vs common lisp
> I don't know where people get this idea that CMUCL is "barely"
>supported. I'm on the cmucl-imp mailing list and there's always work
>going on. Granted, most of the new work starts under Linux (We're
>complaining about that????) but it does find its way into the other
>ports, with Solaris usually first.
It's been pointed out to me that the two main developers prefer
FreeBSD over Linux. The point remains the same however. CMUCL is under
active developement. [Heck, I'm working on the HPUX port. If they've
got me working on it, EVERYONE must be involved! :-) ]