The LL language. [arf6]
Fri, 23 Apr 93 22:37:48 MET DST
>> About the LLL. I have been thinking on it for a while.
>> As I see it, there are two ways of doing it if we consider the Fare' way.
>> 1) Create a assembly like language, interpreted.
>> Say with variables and a couple few commands as add, sub, mov etc.
>> 2) Create a machine language like language, of course interpreted.
>> Say 64bit wide to ease the stepping up to 64bit platforms.
my proposition is
3) Create a stack language, which is EASY to port and interpret, as well
as to simplify and compile, and which is near from the tree representation
obtained while parsing. Quick and efficient.
>> --Andreas Arff firstname.lastname@example.org--