The LL language. [arf6]

[Andreas Arff]

> >>
> >> About the LLL. I have been thinking on it for a while.
> >>
> >> As I see it, there are two ways of doing it if we consider the Fare' way.
> >>
> >> 1) Create a assembly like language, interpreted.
> >> Say with variables and a couple few commands as add, sub, mov etc.
> >>
> >> 2) Create a machine language like language, of course interpreted.
> >> Say 64bit wide to ease the stepping up to 64bit platforms.
> >>
>
> my proposition is
> 3) Create a stack language, which is EASY to port and interpret, as well
> as to simplify and compile, and which is near from the tree representation
> obtained while parsing. Quick and efficient.

Yes, but you can do this in both case 1 and 2:-).

> >>         --Andreas Arff          andreasa@dhhalden.no--
>
>    ,
> Fare

Arff
sig.'s in for 1000 miles service
        --Andreas Arff          andreasa@dhhalden.no--