The LL language. [arf6]
23 Apr 93 23:20:54 +0100
> >> About the LLL. I have been thinking on it for a while.
> >> As I see it, there are two ways of doing it if we consider the Fare' way.
> >> 1) Create a assembly like language, interpreted.
> >> Say with variables and a couple few commands as add, sub, mov etc.
> >> 2) Create a machine language like language, of course interpreted.
> >> Say 64bit wide to ease the stepping up to 64bit platforms.
> my proposition is
> 3) Create a stack language, which is EASY to port and interpret, as well
> as to simplify and compile, and which is near from the tree representation
> obtained while parsing. Quick and efficient.
Yes, but you can do this in both case 1 and 2:-).
> >> --Andreas Arff firstname.lastname@example.org--
sig.'s in for 1000 miles service
--Andreas Arff email@example.com--