Beginning Work [dho12]

[Dan Odom]

Andreas Arff Said:

> Ooooh, nooo!!! I'm in favour for another way of doing it.
>  SupplyMessageSystemCrashFunction (MySystemCrashFunction);
> When a system crash comes, the system crash "spy" calls the
> "MySystemCrashFunction". Then the system would take care of all message
> handling, and the programmer could program, and not think of eartly things
> as messages.

I thought about this, but we're screwed if the programmer isn't
careful about what he puts in the function.

As long as we think we can trust the programmer not to be too
dangerous, this would be OK.

-- 
Dan Odom
danodom@matt.ksu.ksu.edu -- Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS

Support the League for Programming Freedom.  Mail lpf@uunet.uu.net