Test binaries uploaded. Please test these out.

[Nicolas et Ryoko]

Brian T Rice <water at tunes.org> writes:

> I've uploaded some binary-containing packages produced for linux/x86 to:
> 
> http://slate.tunes.org/slate-0.1.tgz

The  slate  binary  also depends  on  the  version  of glibc  you  are
using.   Perhaps  the   binary   package  name   could  reflect   this
(slate-0.1-x86-glibc21-linux.tar.gz for example).

I  am running on  x86 Debian  Sid, which  has glibc  2.3.1, and  get a
relocation error  on __libc_stack_end when  I run the binary  from the
above   URL:   __libc_stack_end@@GLIBC_2.1   in   this   binary,   but
__libc_stack_end@@GLIBC_PRIVATE on my machine.

Rebuilding  ecl   with  LSPCFLAGS  set  to  '-I.'   indeed  fixes  the
compilation  problems  when  filing  in src/build-libs.slate,  as  Lee
mentioned, so I can now build the slate binary and the libs :D .

> Also, let me know what form of the programmer's manual should be included.
> I will probably place the contents in doc/progman/ , or I could leave the
> manual on the web site in its several formats. Which would you prefer?

Netscpape  4.79  (which  I am  using  at  work)  does not  render  the
slate.tunes.org  pages right:  links  and text  get mingled  together,
resulting in an unreadable mess.

I  vote for  having the  progman also  locally in  pdf, for  days when
networks and browsers are not your friends.

-- 
Nicolas