Repository / section for code not to be taken seriously?

[Brian Rice]

Okay, I'll add that as well as a src/unfinished/, and move over  
libraries that don't work yet and should be clearer about that.

On Nov 4, 2005, at 7:40 AM, Bill Sun wrote:

> src/contrib sounds good.
>
> --- Brian Rice <water at tunes.org> wrote:
>
>> On that note, are there any opinions on a
>> src/contrib/ or a contrib
>> repository? The former sounds better since people
>> will get everything
>> at once, darcs move can work for integration and of
>> course darcs send
>> instructions are re-used directly.
>>
>> I'd like to get more involvement and clarity in our
>> project... so
>> comments are welcome.
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2005, at 7:22 AM, Brian Rice wrote:
>>
>>> The point of versioning is just to have a record
>> of changes. You
>>> wouldn't believe some of the funky code that
>> original versions of
>>> files in Slate were. :) In other words, the darcs
>> repository isn't
>>> some holy shrine.
>>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2005, at 6:30 AM, Márton Sasvári
>> (IJ/ETH) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Brian,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I did not have time since then to improve
>> on it but I'll
>>>> get to it in the next month. I don't think it's
>> worth to put it
>>>> under versioning before that.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Marton

--
-Brian