A provocative naming idea for "setter" methods

[Brian Rice]

I should also note that A:= is also valid, except that it has the  
same problem as "A=" of currently being recognized as unary when we'd  
want this case to be handled as a binary selector.

(Hopefully we can conclude this thread shortly so I can address the  
more interesting and pressing issue of improving inheritance.)

On Sep 20, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Brian T. Rice wrote:

> I guess I should point out that I do prefer the "A=" or "=A"
> suggestions over the ones in my original post, which I will agree
> are very confusing and should be considered scrubbed in favor of one
> of those. :)

--
-Brian