Mon, 31 Oct 1994 16:00:21 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 31 Oct 1994, Francois-Rene Rideau wrote:
> What low-level language to choose. We had to choose between a
> TAOS-like RISC-VP thing, or a stack language, or some other thing.
> As efficiency is important here, implementations details are welcome.
I'll nab LLL and be the maintainer (unless someone else has their heart
set on it).
> glossary of terms. We shouldn't quarrel just for words; thus a centralized
> dictionary must help understand each other. For instance, what do Mike
I'll also put dibs on this one, as it could actually be fun.
> We also need write a summary file for each subject.
What do we want out of a summary file? One option is to approach each
discussion as a project. In that case there should be two files; an
archive of all thats been said, and a file listing the purpose and goals
of the group, along with specifications/decisions.
> Anyone can begin a new subject and create a new symbol; one will
> then become the subject maintainer by default (and have to write the
> summary file).
I'd like for there to be a quick little vote for new subjects/projects.
If no one responds or there is immediate just cause the general
maintainer can OK it and subordinate it to the instigator.
> A message should come with "LLL:", "HLL:", "SEC:", "DIS:", etc, beginning the
> subject. Multiple subjects "LLL,DIS:" are ok.
Sounds good to me!