Tcl!?!??? *8-C~
'Chris Harris' B. Harris
chharris@u.washington.edu
Wed, 14 Jun 1995 11:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Okay, then -- I'll forget every intent of looking at TCL. =) (Fine with
me -- saves some good-for-nothing work!)
I think when I was thinking about TCL (and maybe Fare too), I was
thinking more about experimenting with Tk than with TCL itself. So
another language interface should be fine there. Really, if we're just
going to ignore whatever language I experiment with here in the long run
(in favor of the HLL, y'know?), this is more about creating interfaces
than ellegant code. But learning a better language at the same time
would probably be a plus....
Thanks for the suggestions!
-Chris
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Be careful lest in casting out your devil you cast out the best thing
that's in you." --Nietchie %% Me = Chris Harris (chharris@u.washington.edu)
Check out my web page: http://weber.u.washington.edu/chharris/
On Wed, 14 Jun 1995, Rainer Blome wrote:
>
> Are you kidding? Tk is OK (even great, maybe? I have next to no
> experience with it.) But Tcl? If you intend to make anything
> useful, you should use some Scheme version instead:
> Scheme Tk or Guile (the GNU scripting language under development)
> or OScheme, which a Scheme with an Object system based on prototypes (If I
> only had more time to check that one out!).
>
> <A HREF="http://kaolin.unice.fr/html/STk.html">STk (acess Tk via Scheme)</A>
> <A HREF="http://www.inria.fr/koala/abaird/oscheme/oscheme.html">OScheme</A>
> <A HREF="ftp://ftp.cygnus.com/pub/lord/">Guile-II</A>
>
> To get to know the power of Scheme, read Abelson/Sussman's `Structure and
> Interpretation of Computer Programs', if you haven't already. That's such
> a great book, I should have read it two years earlier.
>
> Tcl sucks. Check out
> <A HREF="http://icemcfd.com/tcl/comparison.html">
> Comparisons of Tcl with other systems</A>
>
> Cheerio, Rainer
>