Why Bytecode?
Maneesh Yadav
97yadavm@scar.utoronto.ca
Fri, 06 Feb 1998 16:23:08 -0500
OK, this may be a stupid comment, but I can't figure out a good answer.
Why is that VM's like java impliment their thing with a universal
bytecode?
Why not concentrate on a VM with a readable language with a JIT and save
space by leaving it up to a compression algo.?
In order to prevent the code stealing, mangled sources could be used...
I realize that a bytecode is good since it resembles a processers
instruction set nad is small. But why restrict a language to only work
with today's processing paradigms (who knows what's next). Surely a
good HLL leaves more room for the future.
Doesn't bytcode just put an unessecary step in between
idea->language->program?