26 Oct 1999 05:07:39 +0200
>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Little <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Jim> Laurent Martelli wrote: What are your goals for OIL? What will
Jim> it do when it's fully functional? Assuming it were fully
Jim> functional, how might I use it in a typical day?
>> A casual user would just use it as if it were Linux or
>> Windows. He wouldn't see the difference, excepted that it should
>> be more consistent and easier to use.
>> A programmer would start his day defining new services. When it
>> say `defining', I'm talking about specifications; what the
>> service is supposed to do. He will be able to this thanks high
>> level services enabling him to manipulate high level concepts.
Jim> I see the general vision, but I'm definitely unclear on how
Jim> you'll be implementing this, or what it has to do with AOP.
Jim> But I think I might have to wait until you're further along to
Jim> truly understand it. :)
Maybe we're drifting away from AOP a bit. What I really want to
achieve is separation of concerns : specification and
implementation. AOP provides a more or less formal framework for
this. And it inspired me a lot, that's why I use the word.
Jim> Do you have any plans to update the documentation on your
Jim> website? Right now, there's not much information available.
I've just done this. The tutotial is available online. Feedback is