The web site

[Francois-Rene Rideau]

On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 01:32:20PM -0800, Brian T Rice wrote:
> Okay, my first reaction to all of this is that it's horribly old and
> convoluted and just plain needs a rework from start to finish.
I agree.

> I consider both Fare and Tril to be culpable for the convolution,
> so I really don't want to hear from them about this.
I am really the one to blame for the contents.
Tril sure helped a lot with the administration, the navigation,
and all the services that run so seamlessly on tunes.org.

> I also don't abide by any of the advice to not change the web site until
> all the code is layed down.
Sure. 
If anyone loves the old site, we can always setup the server
so as to just put it in an "old site" section accessible as www2.tunes.org.

> As far as I can tell, this web site needs to
> contain the _plan_ for the code.
>
> If Fare really wants a job based about TUNES,
> the absence of a solid plan with concrete elaboration of any kind
> detracts from the goal being reached. Furthermore, it will mean more to be
> a "member" of the project if the published material can be reliably spoken
> of without saying that it's "that dead pie-in-the-sky project".
Agreed.

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
[  TUNES project for a Free Reflective Computing System  | http://tunes.org  ]
Don't tell me how hard you work.  Tell me how much you get done.
		-- James J. Ling