The web site

[Brian T Rice]

Okay, my first reaction to all of this is that it's horribly old and
convoluted and just plain needs a rework from start to finish. I consider
both Fare and Tril to be culpable for the convolution, so I really don't
want to hear from them about this.

I also don't abide by any of the advice to not change the web site until
all the code is layed down. As far as I can tell, this web site needs to
contain the _plan_ for the code. If Fare really wants a job based about
TUNES, the absence of a solid plan with concrete elaboration of any kind
detracts from the goal being reached. Furthermore, it will mean more to be
a "member" of the project if the published material can be reliably spoken
of without saying that it's "that dead pie-in-the-sky project".

Am I alone on this stance?

-- 
Brian T. Rice
LOGOS Research and Development
mailto:water@tunes.org
http://tunes.org/~water/