TUNES wiki license.

[Faré]

Yes. bugroff is what applies to the Tunes Wiki. If anyone objects or
isn't satisfied, he may speak up (and probably be ignored).

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Every truth passes through three stages before it is recognized.
In the first, it is ridiculed.
In the second, it is opposed.
In the third, it is regarded as self-evident.
        -- Arthur Schopenhauer, 19th century German philosopher


On 28/02/06, Brian Rice <water at tunes.org> wrote:
> That's my conclusion as well. Faré, any input?
>
> On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:15 PM, Massimo Dentico wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > someone is asking on our wiki:
> >
> >   http://tunes.org/wiki/Talk:Freedows
> >
> >   License?
> >
> >   What is the license for the stuff in this
> >   wiki? The info in the freedows article would
> >   help wikipedia's article.
> >
> > I replied:
> >
> >   I think it is safe to consider this wiki uder
> >   the **bugroff license**, which is the license
> >   for Tunes FAQ and Tunes documentation in general.
> >   Anyway, I will ask on Tunes general mailing list.
> >
> > Is my information correct?
>
> --
> -Brian
> http://tunes.org/~water/brice.vcf