TUNES wiki license.
fahree at gmail.com
Tue Feb 28 17:51:26 PST 2006
Yes. bugroff is what applies to the Tunes Wiki. If anyone objects or
isn't satisfied, he may speak up (and probably be ignored).
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Every truth passes through three stages before it is recognized.
In the first, it is ridiculed.
In the second, it is opposed.
In the third, it is regarded as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer, 19th century German philosopher
On 28/02/06, Brian Rice <water at tunes.org> wrote:
> That's my conclusion as well. Faré, any input?
> On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:15 PM, Massimo Dentico wrote:
> > Hi,
> > someone is asking on our wiki:
> > http://tunes.org/wiki/Talk:Freedows
> > License?
> > What is the license for the stuff in this
> > wiki? The info in the freedows article would
> > help wikipedia's article.
> > I replied:
> > I think it is safe to consider this wiki uder
> > the **bugroff license**, which is the license
> > for Tunes FAQ and Tunes documentation in general.
> > Anyway, I will ask on Tunes general mailing list.
> > Is my information correct?
More information about the TUNES