[BUG] [ProgMan] Note that in message sends order of optional keyword arguments is not relevant

[Brian Rice]

Yes, this is now fixed in CVS. I will update the manual sometime soon. 
Thanks for bringing it to my attention!

On Feb 1, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Ken Causey wrote:

> Brian may have already fixed this by the time it appears on the list
> but...
>
> As far as I can tell the manual does not clearly state that optional
> keyword arguments may be specified in any order in a message send 
> (after
> the required arguments of course) and it has been explained to me that
> this is the intended functionality.

--
Brian T. Rice
LOGOS Research and Development
http://tunes.org/~water/