Site repository status(es)

[Pupeno]

On Tuesday 18 July 2006 17:02, Brian T. Rice wrote:
> So, to that end, how about I set up "stable" vs "unstable" vs "???"? Would
> removing the main/alpha branches once these are set up (and described on
> the website) annoy too many people in the wrong way? Is there something
> else I should do entirely?
>
> I want to fix Slate on the limited time/attention I have right now, and I
> don't care how much change/compromise it takes to do that, so please speak
> your minds.

I like KDE's release cycle. I described it here: 
http://pupeno.com/blog/software-release-cycle
The advantages: it gives the developer plenty of space to break everything in 
the process of redesigning and it gives the user a place to look for 
something that works. It give the developers a clear please to put bug-fixes 
for those stable users. And for those users trying the unstable; they have 
been warned.
Hope it helps.
-- 
Pupeno <pupeno at pupeno.com> (http://pupeno.com)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /archives/slate/attachments/20060718/e89c8efa/attachment.pgp