last email on this subject

[Maneesh Yadav]

On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:

> >>>>> "Maneesh" == Maneesh Yadav <97yadavm@scar.utoronto.ca> writes:
> 
>     Maneesh> <originially sent to tom..but I really think some people
>     Maneesh> in the group need to hear this>
> 
>     Maneesh> Sigh...you guys will realize one day... I made it clear
>     Maneesh> numerous times that it was not my intent to be
>     Maneesh> offensive... I put out some questions and all I got were
>     Maneesh> vauge responses that evaluted to "oh yeah I haven't
>     Maneesh> really thought it out yet, but we'll put that feature in,
>     Maneesh> it'll be easy", I say this as my final reponse in this
>     Maneesh> thread, you really have no clue how difficult it is to do
>     Maneesh> what you are doing...
> 
> [[other stuff deleted]]
> 
> I agree with Maneesh. But he seems to miss a key point: all of current
> TUNES programming efforts (including Retro and all my aborted previous
> tries) would (conceptually) only be useful once.
> 
> We are still trying to implement the system which will make doable
> (but hard) to implement TUNES. We are *not* implementing TUNES yet. We
> are in a hard and difficult bootstrapping process. 

Botostrapping what?

> 
> When TUNES will be running it will have not a single byte of code in
> common with current atempts.
> 
> But we would not be able to make TUNES without the hard way of trying
> our current stuffs.
> 
> Best regards, and keep cool.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Basile STARYNKEVITCH - 8 rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 BOURG LA REINE (France)
> tel 01.46.65.45.53. email = basile point starynkevitch at wanadoo point fr
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/starynkevitch/basile 
> antispam: <abuse@wanadoo.fr>
>