Review of TUNES, arrow and the semantic web in the context of the introspector

[James Michael DuPont]

Dear Tuners,

After being accused (Rightfully) of not understanding tunes or doing my
homework, I have started from the beginning. The arrow system is the
first part of tunes that I think could have be grasped and processed by
an machine.  I am starting a very detailed review of TUNEs in the
context of the semantic web and the introspector project.

I have been reviewing the arrow philosophy file, and for this purpose,
I converted it to text, 
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/2003/08/ArrowPhilosophy.txt

PhilosophyText CHUMP entry 
http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/08/30/2003-08-30.html#1062208848.959835

I am not done with this process, but as far as I can tell, arrow and
the semantic web are very related, more than noted in the tune cliki.
In fact, the definition of the MetaText seems to do a disservice to the
semantic web, I can only assume that this is because lack of deeper
research.
MetaText  CHUMP
http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/08/30/2003-08-30.html#1062231989.305187

I have extracted the beginnings of an OWL ontology for the classes of
arrow here :
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/2003/08/arrowclasses.n3
CHUMP :
http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/08/30/2003-08-30.html#1062234793.644775

When I am finished reviewing arrow, then I can make the connection
between the semantic web and the arrow system. This will put the
introspector in context.

Specifically  : Based on the definition of MetaText, 
my hypothesis  is so far :
This is very similar to the work being done now by the introspector
project. The de/re-composable objects are in the introspector handled
by RDF gateways and de-reassemblers, not by rewriting everything in
lisp/smalltalk or someother funky language.

peace,
mike

=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com