What I've learned so far...
Tom Novelli
tom@tunes.org
Sun Mar 23 15:35:03 2003
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 01:58:15AM +0100, Massimo Dentico wrote:
>
> In responding to a comment by Jeff Cutsinger, alias Seaslug, about your
> paper I have written a rebuttal regarding the supposed inherent slowness
> of Forth wrt C.
>
> This is probably of general interest so I post the link here:
>
> http://cliki.tunes.org/Forth%20is%20NOT%20intrinsically%20slow
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Massimo Dentico
I stand by my conclusion. C translates directly to Forth, but some really
easy optimizations are done in the process. Types make this possible, and
infix syntax helps a little also. For an equal effort, C is faster. It's
also easier to read and maintain. I won't be drawn into a holy war. I'm
just saying Forth has no place in Tunes.
Tom Novelli