[Unios] unios, a proposed shortcut
andpe161@student.liu.se
andpe161@student.liu.se
Tue Jul 10 21:24:02 2001
It seems unclear to me what your agenda is=2E Do you want to convince the=
Freedows guys=2C or do you just send out a general plea for help=3F In no=
place do you mention UniOS - I suspect UniOS is not why you came here=2E
Indeed=2C creating the core of the OS is always an obstacle before more
interesting work can be done=2E Unless some existing codebase is employed=
=2E
However=2E UniOS does not focus on =22run=5Bning=5D any program from any =
other
os on any machine=22=2E For that=2C existing OSes would du just fine=2C =
for
example Linux=2E Neither do we restrict our ambitions to =22a stable os t=
hat
we don=27t have to pay a lot of money for=22=2C or we would be all over s=
ome
of the existing promising open OSes=2E
No=2C the goals of UniOS and many other projects are much more lofty - to=
actually change the way computing is done and organized=2C to allow the
field of computing to continue moving forward and make computers a
magnitude more usable=2E This goal is not reachable with existing
codebases=2E At most it could simulate such a system=2E
/Anders Petersson
----- Ursprungligt Meddelande -----
Fr=E5n=3A BroknDodge =3Cbrokndodge=40yahoo=2Ecom=3E
Datum=3A S=F6ndag 8 Juli 2001 02=3A59
=C4mne=3A =5BUnios=5D unios=2C a proposed shortcut
=3E =
=3E i have been following the =22development=22 of freedows since late 98=
=2E =
=3E around the same time i happened across linux=2E i have now been =
=3E playing around with linux for some 3 years=2E it=27s a great os=2C j=
ust =
=3E needs more commercial software support=2E =
=3E =
=3E now=2C freedows seems to have fallen to the wayside=2E after 5 years=
=
=3E of development they still don=27t have a working os=2E while they ma=
y =
=3E someday be able to get a working system together i don=27t believe =
=3E they will ever achieve their goals=2E
=3E =
=3E understand i am not a developer=2C more of an idea guy=2E it seems t=
o =
=3E me that the main problem with most new os projects is that they =
=3E want to reinvent the kernal instead of building off of another =
=3E project already in place=2E many of the new os projects have the =
=3E same goal=3A a unified os that will run any program from any other os=
=
=3E on any machine=2E thats a lofty goal! however with the hundreds of =
=3E projects out there it might be possible if everyone works together=2E=
=
=3E =
=3E =
=3E my idea=3A the linux kernal is already built to accept modules=2E i=
t =
=3E will run most unix programs=2E if a new os were built off of the =
=3E linux kernal it would cut development time in half=2E it has already=
=
=3E been ported to most machines currantly in development (i think i =
=3E even remember seeing a port for the amiga!) so here it is=3A begin =
=3E with the linux kernal (because the work has already been done) and =
=3E begin developing the modules to build in compatibility for other =
=3E oses=2E the Wine project is handling the windows problem fairly well=
=
=3E but i recommend implementing wine in a module (they are actually =
=3E working on an instruction set that will allow windows developers to =
=3E easily port ther software to linux)=2E dos has already been =
=3E implemented in a module=2E there=27s only a couple of os=27s left=2E=
if =
=3E everyone will pull together linux could become what you are all =
=3E trying to build in a much shorter time=2E
=3E =
=3E it seems to me that the toughest problem is creating a working=2C =
=3E stable kernal=2E that kernal is already here=2E so develope new =
=3E modules for it=2E if you don=27t like the way the linux kernal does =
=3E things join the kernal development team and propose the changes=2E =
=3E =
=3E basically we all want the same thing=3A a stable os that we don=27t =
=3E have to pay a lot of money for! we should all unite under the same =
=3E banner to achieve this=2E a unified os will never be possible unless=
=
=3E we all UNITE under the same banner=2E
=3E =
=3E thx for listening=2C
=3E =
=3E mark c=2E west
=3E =
=3E legacytek
=3E =
=3E =
=3E Mark C=2E West
=3E LegacyTek
=3E =
=3E =
=3E ---------------------------------
=3E Do You Yahoo!=3F
=3E Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only =2435 a year=
!
=3E http=3A//personal=2Email=2Eyahoo=2Ecom/